|
ISSUES
Reprinted from the ‘Messenger’ (With
Permission)
Union opposes Sexual Orientation
Regulations
In the days preceding the debate on
the Sexual Orientation Bill many Seventh-day Adventists in the
UK wrote either to their local Member of Parliament or to the
Prime Minister expressing their opposition from a Christian
perspective to the new Sexual Orientation Regulations. On behalf
of the Church’s 26,500 members in the British Isles, Union
president Pastor D. W. McFarlane wrote an open letter to Prime
Minister Tony Blair, the full text of which appears below:
The Rt. Honourable Tony Blair
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA.
Dear Prime Minister
RE:
SEXUAL ORIENTATION BILL
I write on behalf of the Seventh-day
Adventist church in the British Isles to express concern
regarding the proposed Sexual Orientation Bill. As a church we
fully support the principles of equality and justice for all in
society and can understand that the Government wish to be seen
as being even-handed in the treatment of all citizens.
However, equality and justice also
mean that all citizens should be afforded the right to express
their views and act in harmony with the dictates of conscience
where such views and practice are within the bounds of decency.
We feel that the very principle that
has driven the Government to formulate the Sexual Orientation
Bill is being violated with respect to the overwhelming majority
of Christians. Certain aspects of the Bill will essentially
discriminate against Christian beliefs and practice.
After careful consideration of the
document we have highlighted the following key elements which
will negatively impact the Seventh-day Adventist Church and
numerous other Christian denominations
in the British Isles:
1. Churches currently meeting in
public buildings or those receiving public funding could be open
to litigation if they hold to the Bible’s teaching on moral
beliefs and sexual ethics. The Bill overrides freedom of
religious expression on fundamental core beliefs.
2. Without proper protections the new
laws will lead to courts adjudicating on what is and what is not
authentic Christian teaching and practice. This would be in
breach of religious liberty.
3. At present it is lawful for a
Christian B&B to refuse a double room to unmarried
heterosexuals. Under the proposed legislation Christian B&Bs
which refuse to give double beds to homosexuals or Christian old
people’s
homes that only allow double rooms for
married couples could be closed down or fined. Most Christians
will continue to hold to the view that sex is to take place
between a man and a woman within marriage.
4. The new regulations threaten to
promote homosexuality in all schools and in various subjects.
They also will frustrate the parental right of withdrawal from
sex education. This will be in conflict with deep religious
beliefs of
many parents. The new gay rights laws
should not override the national curriculum and remove existing
safeguards for parents. The majority of Christian parents will
not want homosexuality promoted to their children.
5. The gay rights activists have
sought to ban Christian Unions from university campuses. It
appears that under the new regulations this could easily become
a reality.
6. Churches who refuse membership or
baptism to practising homosexuals could be fined for so doing or
for the way in which their decision is explained.
7. Many good law-abiding Christians
could be made to break the law as a result of the new
legislation, in that they will feel obliged to live in harmony
with deeply-held beliefs that are based upon the Bible and in so
doing break the laws of the country. There is a vital need for
exemptions in the proposed regulations to protect religious
liberty and schools. The Equality Act 2006 provides reasonable
exemptions to protect most of the
major activities of religious groups.
Unless parallel exemptions are included in the Sexual
Orientation Regulations, the Government would be indirectly
discriminating against religious believers as they are
proportionately more likely to believe that homosexual practice
is wrong.
It is clear that the new laws will
benefit only a few people. The 2001 Census revealed that less
than 0.2% of all households in England and Wales are headed by a
same-sex couple (Census 2001). It seems unfair then that such
sweeping new laws are being created for such a small number of
people, while ignoring the views of the majority.
The new proposed sexual orientation
regulations come under the category of civil, not criminal laws.
As such they are relatively easy to use and activists could
launch legal actions against their opponents with little
difficulty. We would not want our Church or any Christian
organisation to be sued for upholding basic Christian teaching
on sexual morality.
We therefore urge you, Prime Minister,
to reconsider the implications of this Bill to the religious
liberty of the many sincere Christians in the UK who want to
exercise their right to religious freedom and expression of
beliefs and practice.
Yours respectfully
Don W McFarlane
Top of page |